Amplifying topics that matter in a world filled with noise.

Ubuntu Edge: a.k.a. The Fruit Slicer! **

I must admit, I was *startled* by the announcement of Ubuntu Edge today. Bold. Disruptive. BRILLIANT!

Please join me in thanking Mark, Jane, Jono, Rick, Alan, Jorge, Robbie, Daniel, Dave, Nicholas and all of the fine folks at Canonical and "not at Canonical" for all the hard work, blood, sweat and tears that have gone into getting Ubuntu this far. A move like this takes guts.

With this in place, Ubuntu is poised to do to the phone industry what it has done to the PC industry. Or, in other words:

"Let's slice some fruit and have a great time!""Let's slice some fruit and have a great time!"

Do you want to help? Consider contributing your money here:

Don't have the funds right now? Consider getting involved in helping design and build the phone by joining the Ubuntu Phone Team's mailing list:

But talk is cheap. I contributed ideas, bug reports, and money. Did you?

"Be the change you want to see in the world."

Image (CC BY-NC 2.0)
** My son came up with the "Fruit Slicer" title. How neat is that!?

Did you know that "Ubuntu is not just software?" ;)

Community Leadership Summit 2013 - Opening

With preparations complete, the opening session started. Jono walked attendees through the background, goals, and format of the summit.

Like other years, the summit format was to be conducted in an "unconference" style. Attendees were asked to consider hosting a session and to indicate their proposed session on a session card. Then, one by one, the proposals were pitched to the audience to get people excited about all the lively discussions ahead.

Proposals complete, the remaining task was to get them on the day's schedule. Here it is!

Day 1 totally designed by community leaders from around the world - great minds from as far away as Kenya and New Zealand.

Community Leadership Summit 2013 - Setup

In the wee hours of Saturday morning and running only on caffeine the crew was hard at work getting CLS 13 ready for the hundreds of attendees from around the world. I managed to snap a few impromptu photos with my Ubuntu Phone between setup duties.

The intractable schedule board! It's amazing how the seemingly small details take so long to finish. Here, the crew puts finishing touches on the day's session schedule. It took four of us over an hour to make this:

My crew-mate and I were instructed by Jono to "tape down anything that people might trip over." After carefully scouting the rooms for loose cables, we discovered a previously overlooked but huge hazard and dealt with it...

Mission accomplished.

Community Leadership Summit 2013 - It Is ON

After many (4) years of wanting to attend, and having various road-blocks to doing that, I'm finally here!

I'll be sharing some updates as I get time between sessions and after each day.

In the meantime, if you are an Ubuntu person and here too, please find me and come and say hi! I'd love to meet more of our fine community.

Refining the Message

You've likely heard me say (and maybe even sing) that:

"Ubuntu is not just software."

I would like to introduce you to the Five "P's" in Ubuntu

Ubuntu is a:


that inspires


to participate in a massive collaborative


that creates a rich and solid


that supports useful and freedom-respecting


that the whole world can enjoy.

When I was in Budapest at a UDS, Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) presented a plenary session and introduced me to the concept of thinking about Ubuntu as more than an OS. I am greatly thankful to him for doing that and for inspiring this post. We stand taller on the shoulders of giants.

Spies Amongst US

I usually don't wade into politics, but this hits too close to home to not voice an opinion, and there is a link to Ubuntu.

When I was growing up, I loved the music of Prism , a band that hails from Vancouver. Now that I call Vancouver home, I love them even more. Here's an interesting fact for the space lovers amongst us: "On Sunday, March 6, 2011, Prism's "Spaceship Superstar" was chosen as the wakeup song for the Space Shuttle Discovery crew members." How cool is that? If you love space, please take a listen. It will cheer you up and inspire you before you read the rest of my article.

Late last week some news broke about a different group with a lacklustre name and no musical talent. Terrible musicians who unfortunately stole the name of one of my favourite bands for their pet project - spying. Very disappointing. And, it seems they have a list of friends that you'll recognize.

News of this project and its goals did not come as a surprise to me, and likely not to you as well.

Take a deep breath and read this.

Take another deep breath and read this.

If the articles are a surprise to you, please consider the logical fallacy known as "false premise". Perhaps growing up you were given a premise that certain places are beacons of freedom and free speech and that they protect the same. You may have received this "information" from movies, television, newspapers, etc. And if you lived in certain places, you may have even sung songs to that effect. You were lied to.

So, knowing that these events have occurred and will continue to occur, what is an appropriate and direct action that you can take? On the surface it seems like an intractable problem to solve. Fortunately it's not. Here are a few simple steps that you can take right now to protect yourself, your friends and your family:

1) Start with yourself. Think about all the services you use and whether they are on the list. If they are, take immediate steps to discontinue their use. Are you a Verizon customer? Time to leave. Liking Facebook? What's stopping you from using Diaspora instead?

2) Next help your friends and loved ones. If you have people in your life that you care about that use services or products from the companies listed in the report, please reach out to them and help them leave TODAY. Does your best friend use Yahoo mail? Offer an alternative. Help make it easy for them.

3) Double down your efforts on Ubuntu. Encourage your friends who have been sitting on the sidelines to do the same. The only way to achieve freedom and the promise of a shared humanity is to build it. Don't waste your time trying to fix a broken political process that is built on greed and psychopathy. The best way forward is to build a system that works better. (Luckily, many of you reading this post are already involved in Ubuntu. Thank you! Please tell your friends.)

There is a saying that I like to cite in circumstances like this: "You can't change the world, but you *can* change your world."

Start simple. Start local. Be the change you want to see.

Image by "Colourless Rainbow" CC by-nc-sa

On Erasing Ubuntu's Artificial Borders: The vUDS Discussion (Part2)

Last week at vUDS we had the discussion about erasing the current national-(and sometimes state)-border-centric organization of Ubuntu (loco) teams.

I summarized the first half in an earlier blog post. (See

Here's a detailed (but rough) summary of the second half of the discussion. It's still faster than watching.

Proposal Summary:
Enabling teams that are not in the current geography that one would associate with loco teams
There has been talk on Planet Ubuntu and Community Roundtables about the notion of creating teams for any geography, to form freely and to potentially remove barriers on team formation based on that.

Rochester (which is not nearly as big as Vancouver), has two Linux User groups, one is a community-based group focussed on end-users and showing them how to use Gimp and showing them how to replace proprietary office suites, and there is a group based around R.I.T. (a technical college) and they are into developing projects and software , some people are kernel hackers, some people want to work on file-systems, and the two groups exist, we know of each other, sometimes people from one group present at the other group, when we do install-fests or hackathons, we do them together, but the meetings are at different times and different places and serve two different groups but we really don't compete because the developers don't want to go and see a presentation on Gimp typically and the people that are using Gimp and repalcing proprietary OS'es with Ubuntu as an end-user have no interest in going and learning what BTRFS is bringing to the table for Linux so that's a good example where it could even exist in a smaller city such as Rochester.

Good points.
I'd like to play out some ideas to get the discussion going a little more. Let's do a thought experiment: Let's all try to imagine the absolute worst thing that could happen in the next three months. So say, tomorrow Jono (or someone like Jono) says: "Ok! Any teams, anywhere, any reason... Go for it!" Can we think about what might happen?

Worst-case scenario would be over-fragmentation, new people coming into the community not knowing exactly where to go to have a team, and then a little bit on what Josee has said, all of a sudden people try to contact the first three teams on the list and those teams have become inactive in a short period of time because there was a burst of "I'm really interested in this" and then it faded and new people looking to find an active team can't find one so they assume the whole project is dead.

Over-fragmentation and people try to contact ones that are dead. Maybe lack of resources in terms of conference packs or materials that we would want to have for events , or perhaps people starting to leave because they don't know what's happening around the community or where the organization is, if they can find it...

The problem would be for the local people that live in the cities trying to find which of their local teams are actually active at that moment. For example, a metro that has 5 teams with 4 of them inactive, that's a lot of time trying to figure out which one of these teams are actually doing things.

More factions... LCC often deals with Loco teams needing to mediate situations between loco leaders. A number of teams have had two locos in one city and it's not gone on well, the LCC has had to spend a lot of time trying to work with that. She can think of three locos that it's happened to in the last year. It gets quite bitter and nasty and people get so annoyed at the situation that they walk away.
If there are more and more locos, not too sure that the LCC could handle it. They get quite busy sometimes, providing help to people and answering queries... she enjoys it and has been on the LCC for three and a half years and doesn't give up her time just by choice, she really enjoys it and wants to stick around and increasing teams may make it less enjoyable. If it's not fun and not enjoyable to stay around the loco community then why would people stay around?
If there are multiple local events or locos in an area it may reduce the quality of an event, or the quality of participation - people don't know how to get involved.
Do you dilute the value of the Ubuntu loco and just call it a LUG? The big difference between a Loco and a LUG is that we specifically try to promote Ubuntu, rather than just diluting the Linux feel about things

One other thing we should consider:
What is the worst-case scenario if we keep it status quo:

If we keep things status quo we will not be able to grow our community as quickly as it needs to grow to support and to nurture all of the people that are going to soon be exposed to Ubuntu (because of Ubuntu's consumerization that is right around the corner.) I see that when phones and tablets and touch devices hit there will be a ground swell of recognition and awareness around Ubuntu and people will start looking for community help and/or just other people who are knowledgeable about it, and having more groups around that can potentially catch and help these people will build bigger and stronger communities and will serve the Ubuntu project better than if we don't have those communities in place and the only contact that these new Ubuntu users have with Ubuntu is through a Verizon store or a T-Mobile store or a Best Buy. I would not like to see that be the Ubuntu experience where people have to walk into a store to get any information about Ubuntu. I'd love the community to be out in front of the retail channel and consumerization.

A secondary fear would be that the current teams seem to be losing energy and I don't know if that's just my perception or if that is real, but I can recall a few years back there seemed to be a lot more energy around things like Jams and global events and more activity in general. I'm not sure what we need to do to re-invigorate the community but perhaps if we generate some more noise and get more people joining groups and talking about joining groups thant maybe it'll have a catalyst effect and some of the national teams will start to re-energize based on that.

Similar to what you're saying, we'd end up with (and I don't want to say we'd lose steam or have lost steam) but that we wouldn't capture potential new users... that's the thing I'd be nervous about. There may be people that are not being served by the current structure and feel frustrated by the limits currently put on them and therefore they are going off and doing other things instead of becoming a part of the Ubuntu community.

YoBoy mentioned on IRC: Each one has his own point of view depending on how we lead our advocacy and promoting experience

In his (Josee's) experience. things will just continue as normal

Minnesota has 4 areas: west metro, east metro, Duluth and Morehead. We currently have just a Minnesota loco and the problem is that if we stay how we were, everyone will continue looking to their local LUGs instead of the local team to go for events, such as east metro: the only events that happen are provided by the local LUG and the problem with that is that with loco teams there's a "You're a new user, come join us! We're here for anyone who's new or the experienced." With a LUG it's like "You haven't been using Linux for 5 years, then what are you doing here?" At least thats how it is with our local LUG teams, they seem to be a bit more xenophobic,and that would actually tend to push people away from wanting to get into Linux

I've thought about this a lot. I'm not too sure there are massive amounts of risks. If you look at the loco team portal or even doing a search for loco and Ubuntu events you see so many images of events that are happening and that is the benefit of being able to see this from the review process of looking at teams -- you see the massive amounts of work that teams do. Some teams are really small and unique and I don't see anything wrong with that. If they have 12 people in their team, kudos to them, because those 12 people are spreading Ubuntu in that community and if they meet up once a month, or once every 6 months to have a release party then I think that's brilliant. Other teams are more fortunate. They have larger teams and that could be just down to that area where they are and it's nothing to do with how much people promote it - it's the area you live in has more technical kinds of companies in the area or people tha have more interest. you can't always govern that.
If you search.. I found the other day that the Iranian loco did a release party and had 30-40 people on stage. it looks amazing. And if you look at somebody else's like Mexico and Columbia who have done fantastic release parties as well... they are all active . Sure there are going to be times when teams go through quiet periods but if they're still active or are just chatting away on IRC or on a mailing list, I don't see that as a bad thing. Now whether that's going to be the crux of Loco teams not promoting or going forward as such but I don't know... I do know that I love being in a Loco more than a LUG because I enjoy the Ubuntu community and I know full well that had I not got involved in the Ubuntu community more so than my LUG then I probably would not have been where I am today. And that is just that I found it a more welcoming environment and each loco caters to different levels so some locos like the Italian loco does the iso testing, which is fantastic and is needed. Other locos might just meet up and go for a drink or just chat on IRC... they both really provide a different service from one another and I think that's a good thing.

Without naming names and getting into specifics can you talk about situations where you've seen teams in conflict that have split into two teams and what the dynamics are? I'm thinking that if we said "Ok any team can start up" we may see that happening. What happens when a team splits generally in your experience?

It has fighting, a lot of animosity ... people will say things like that person's not doing things in the Ubuntu way: they're using it for their business (We have seen that a lot actually). We see people say that person won't let me organize events in my area . We see people spreading not always the best comments about one-another. Equally I have other teams that don't speak to one another but they could be in the same country and they just don't see eye-to-eye. Not everyone's going to get on together. That's the fact of the matter, but if you have two locos within a small distance of one another then you'd hope that they'd work together and that isn't always possible. More often we get called in when there's already two loco teams in an area and they realize this when one group possibly wants to become more official and one group wants to possibly get the domain, use the wiki pages and realizes that another person's using it on Facebook, on Meetup etc and that's where we get more involved. Some groups don't see eye-to-eye and we've had two leaders from the two different groups step aside and just walk away and then those two locos are dead... and that's happened, which is rather unfortunate.

Yes that's definitely unfortunate. When the groups get to that state, there's a collision there's a conflict and then both leaders walk away have you seen any examples where someone comes in and tries to pick up the pieces and tries to re-form? Does that ever happen or often happen? I'm thinking maybe a new team comes in and says "Ok we're going to ignore the other teams and start new".

I hope that we wouldn't have three teams to deal with. I hope that the two teams would find a way to work together and find a new person (I try to look on the bright side of things). I think in the past people have just been so put off by the fighting at that point that people just want a time out and hopefully in a few months' time they'll actually come back together and
get the group back on its feet but I do know that some people have been frustrated. I've seen certain locos just lose interest because of it which is again unfortunate. They just want to use Ubuntu at that point and that's great: they still want to use Ubuntu, they still want to spread the Ubuntu word, that's good. They just don't want to be in involved in the Loco, the ground events.

That's really good perspective. One of the things I've noticed through some of the groups that I've interaacted with and to some extent with the group in Vancouver is that people sometimes come into Ubuntu groups for the wrong reasons (though everyone has their reasons) but when I say the "worng" reasons what I mean is that some people come into Ubuntu groups expecting LUG's, some people come into Ubuntu groups expecting people that talk about free software in general, some people come into an Ubuntu group because they want to further a business goal... Would it be helpful if we had some kind of guidance for people who want to start an Ubuntu group? Something crisp that could help them steer clear of some of these traps down the road? For example, "Here are some great reasons to start an Ubuntu group" and "here are some not-so-great reasons to start and Ubuntu group that we've seen may create problems down the road. Anyone want to jump in on whether or not that would be useful, or whether we've tried it?

It's not a bad idea. We have the best practices which are basically how you set up a Loco but maybe that's something we could look at updtaing that page and reasons for setting up a loco and possibly pitfalls to avoid. So, that's something we could look at updating the wiki page. So I'll take that down as an ation item if you want and look at updating the wiki page.

Thank you. That would be awesome.
Charles, Josee, Paul... any thoughts on that? People coming in for the wrong reasons? How to make it more crisp to the people who would think of starting a group?

Not so much on the wrong reasons aspect but definitely telling people how to go about building a team would be good. In my state the team that originally formed before I was there was overly formal, and actually adopted a constitution for a group, had officer's positionsand was way too formal for an actual loco team. I know where it stemmed from, they thought they were going to be a 403.1c which is a not-for-profit group which requires a board of directors and officers, etc.
I think reviewing how to structure a team and make it successful to grow and I think the other thing that we experienced as well as a problem with my short stint on the LCC was teams that are in transition. Teams should set up a process internally so that if a leader does become inactive due to family issue, personal issues, job issues, moving away etc. that it's easy for the other team members to pick up the pieces as opposed to having to jump through a lot of hoops that aren't well documented and that way one person losing interest that was the leading person at first doesn't kill a team due to their own inactivity.

We have about 4 minutes left... I'm not inclined to put this matter to a vote of any kind. What I am inclined to do is to let this session be an input to the Community Council and to the LoCo council so that they can go onward and discuss further how to move forward. I'd also invite anyone who is not on this hangout to write about it, blog about it so that we have everybody's perspective on this and hopefully we can move forward at some point and see what we can do...

On that note if anybody does have any ideas and you want to drop the Loco council an email please let us know. We've just had an election and are getting new members up to speed so this is something that we can dig into this cycle. It's like everything though.. there are pros and cons for doing what we've just heard but if you'd like to drop a note to the Loco council we'd love to hear from people that way and we'll take it up from there.

Thank you Laura for reaching out and for taking that on. And thanks everyone for joining the session today... there's 2 mins to go I'll break a little early so we can get back to the CTR or back to work or wherever we need to go. Thanks Charles for joining us from the Community Council and thank Laura for joining us from the loco council. It's great to have your leadership and your insight on this call.

I'm looking forward to growing and making the Ubuntu community bigger and faster and stronger...

On Erasing Ubuntu's Artificial Borders: The vUDS Discussion

Last week at vUDS we had the discussion about erasing the current national-(and sometimes state)-border-centric organization of Ubuntu (loco) teams.

Here's a detailed (but rough) summary of the first half of the discussion. It's faster than watching.

Proposal Summary:
Enabling teams that are not in the current geography that one would associate with loco teams
There has been talk on Planet Ubuntu and Community Roundtables about the notion of creating teams for any geography, to form freely and to potentially remove barriers on team formation based on that.

Participant's thoughts:

Wants to create a team for his part of Minnesota, because the state is divided - two major cities right next to each other - Minneapolis and St. Paul - would be easier for him if he could lead a west metro team instead of having a whole big Minnesota thing becuase most likely all the people over in St. Paul aren't going to attend his events and vice-versa

This situation likely applies to a lot of places, in the US, in Canada, and other countries

Extremely large geographic regions could benefit from having multiple team e.g. Texas, Alaska - there's huge spaces between cities. Another example is his state of NY where they have the 8th most populous city in the world and they probably would be a good location to have a focussed team just on NYC. Speaking with them has revealed they have far different challenges than does Rochester NY, so Charles feels out of his element in helping them finding places to meet, and other details that are different due to them being so large. He understands there are concerns with wanting to control things but feels that we shouldn't inhibit people from growing teams in places like that. There is currently no Community Council opinion at this point -each member probably has their own thoughts and in general the CC would want to work with the LoCo council on those kinds of things.

Good and bad both
Good: may help some teams like the Russian team - super big and many cities far apart
in Peru - many events during the year, people can easily reach out for support from existing team
long term- doesn't want to see a lot of inactive teams on the Loco directory - e/g. in Peru if there were 20 teams, some big teams working, other small ones not, but all listed and no one willing to revive the inactive teams - this will get people confused and many people just want to join, and not lead

India is very large, with very big cities, let's have city-based teams like Calcutta, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai where pop's are huge 10M, so users can get local support as quickly as possible

Loco Council has been brainstorming and trying to come up with best practices on this for three months - they were looking at larger countries and breaking them into a similar situation to what the United States has done and also what Brazil has done on their own (breaking themselves into smaller provinces or states) which seems to have worked pretty well
Comes with advantages and disadvantages - there will be states that are so large that they are the size of a small country, but if you break down a large state into smaller pieces what you might find is that you have a very small loco in one town and then the next city is where all the activity is, making people feel disheartened
If you break it down even further like they are thinking of doing with India then it can come down to being even language-specific as well within certain cities and provinces so where do you draw the line?

Acknowledges the issue. Every place has its own language. There is no common colloquial language

We can't use the same criteria for every country but can come up with a set of guidelines and best practices and India's more unique than others
They (LCC) do get requests, even this week for a sub-loco team, currently don't have a process so have been telling them to join the main (parent) loco and work with that - events can still be added to the LoCo team portal - it's not like we're saying "Just because you don't exist as a sub team you cant add your event on the loco team portal" there's nothing like that happening, events still get added and promoted

We cannot have the same criteria, at the comm roundtable we were also thinking of dropping the term "Approved" from loco teams. What would be the effect of this on teams that request materials - is the material going to be enough for the sub teams? probably yes but we need to remember that the materials are costing money (not free)
If people want to set up sub teams they should have to go to the loco council to see if it is right, otherwise people may do their own thing and it wont be good it will be too random

Recounted Steve Kellat (Ohio) blog - Ohio used to have smaller active teams, more active than state level team. Over time those teams became less active as people moved on to other projects. Now it appears Ohio is fairly dormant both on a state level and a more local level and possibly could benefit from a super-state. Steven mentioned regions that are close to Ohio (across state borders) that have activity and would be useful to partner with them. Though we tend to talk about dividing countries we may also want to talk about consolidating where necessary.
Another thought that was raised yesterday (from Ben Kerensa) was around the Portland team, or Oregon team, at one point in time there was a PNW team that was proposed as a super-state perhaps consisting of Washington, Oregon and parts of Northern California. He can envision highly dense areas like NYC (as Charles pointed out) that might be candidates for a team, where in more rural (sparsely populated) areas might be great candidates for super-state teams or regional teams that span several states or provinces or perhaps even a collection of cities e.g. NYC and NJ where they are right up against each other, there may be cities that are adjacent to one another that could form a super-city team which could potentially create a lot more activity than a city alone.

I think of San Francisco where there are three major cities within a 1 hour bus ride: Oakland, San Francisco, and San Jose , with silicon valley in between - this is a very large region with an unfortunately small team - so I am looking at both directions, we can go small geography, we can go big geography, what I would like to see is a situation where we expand and contract the geography in any manner that gets the teams as active and as large as possible, so we wouldn't necessarily be ruling out any level of team. Country teams are useful in some places and less useful in other places

In other words, remove any specific requirements of geography or population density. He still thinks we need to have a minimum to use some word to acknowledge them as a team and not having a situation where we get a one-person team that stays one person and declares itself a team versus to have them grow an actual community and that would have to be worked out: when do we actually say they're a team and then there's another level when do we extend the privilege of letting them have a mailing list? perhaps the mailing list exists at a state level and then multiple teams can share the mailing list . From one perspective it's great to have organic growth and do think that that's the way to go whether it be two cities that are close to each other or in a case like Cincinnati that is in two states (Ohio and Kentucky) , but what do we do on the back end and how do we deal with that as far as getting them resources like a forum and a mailing list etc? Jono has said that there are multiple ways for people to do that themselves now and it's not quite as strong a requirement for the Canonical Ubuntu community team to provide that because they can make their own Google plus - these things need to be worked out

There is a threshold where a team becomes a team. That threshold is bigger than one person. We could arbitrarily set a threshold for resources saying that if your team is more than 50 people then you have eligibility for something - whatever that something is - maybe we go orders of magnitude 50, 500, 5000, then you have eligibility for the next tier, whatever the next tier is - that's one way to slice it

That would be very hard/unfair on smaller countries no? e.g. Ireland has just under 4 million (essentially population of London), and is not possible/feasible to break it down further

A small country small population would have to catch a larger area. threshold would be reached at some geography e.g. Iceland. There would be workarounds, we wouldn't be penalizing a country for a small population, we'd be acknowledging that their geographical catch area would need to be largerr to catch enough people to get whatever resources they need

Need to keep in mind: Canonical and Loco council have mentioned that if we keep increasing the loco teams (which is brilliant to see happening) but if you break into sub teams that puts an increase on any kind of gift you get from Canonical so that's the reason we've kept to a structure. If we say anyone can go off and create a loco team and then tomorrow you have 400 new loco teams you might think it's great to see that happening as a growth perspective then that means there's an extra burden on finding conference packs. It's not an issue now, but it could be an issue 6 months or two years from now and if we don't have structures in place then we can't deal with that .

Also, the Loco council has informed the CC last week they intend to get rid of the terms "Approved" and "Unapproved" and replace it with one word: verified, then everyone will be a loco team. the LCC does work on issues in the background but it can be a slow process at times

I have blogged about the notion of conducting an experiment and think that we are in a spot right now where there are valid concerns about letting people form teams in any geography for any reason. There are resource concerns, process concerns and labour concerns, but we've never tried it and if we've never tried it I think those concerns are fears that are out there but they don't have any data to help make decisions or to build process around, so what I was advocating is we run it as an experiment for one UDS cycle as an experiment then we do a checkpoint to see what has happened, what processes need to be changed, or whether we scrap the whole idea or revert.

I think that unless we are willing to assume a little bit of risk to the project and the people that participate in it we are caught in this spot where we're afraid to move. That was my proposal- I'm big on data and I'm big on making decisions based on data so if three months down the road we saw 6000 teams and Canonical people were screaming at us because they can't send out conference packs fast enough then that would trigger a set of decisions that would fix the problem either through process or additional money or some other means or a threshold or an increase in the barrier in becoming a team that gets goodies.

Another scenario - Vancouver - someone tomorrow that feels they are unhappy with Ubuntu Vancouver decides they're going to create "Ubuntu Vancouver Prime", so now there's two teams in Vancouver,what would that mean for a team like Vancouver? I've thought about that quite a lot and I think what it might mean is that there's a team in Vancouver that is an alternative for people who aren't getting what they need from the existing team . For example the Vancouver team is very heavy on marketing and advocacy and social events and very light on development, programming and technical events, so I could see a second team in a city like Vancouver or somewhere else being heavily technically-oriented and thriving in that context and having two city teams that thrive for different reasons because they are meeting a different need. Vancouver's a fairly large and dense city so this may not work in smaller towns and villages .

I mention that because some cities countries or states may have a fear of duplication, but I also look at it as a useful thing because it could also mean segmentation and serving a community better than a single team could serve... so I'll throw that out there as a thought experiment....

... to be continued.

Are you a person that wants to start a block, village, town, city, super-city, super-state or super-national team? How about a planetary team? Have you been discouraged?


Word to the wise: Sometimes storms that seem small enough to fit in vessels that some would use to brew tea are symptoms of larger issues that need to be examined and changed lest the vessel crack. And sometimes when one is not in the vessel, one cannot see the importance of a tiny swirl that begins the tornado... There's a funny story and quote from some English politician about a tea thing that happened in America a while ago, but I'll leave that for another post. ;) Stated non-cryptically, I'm glad we've begun this discussion even if some may not understand why.

Ubuntu knows no borders.

I am Stateless (and So Is Ubuntu)

I am part of a team without state. Please don't feel sad for me though. I am part of an amazing community filled with friendly and diverse people. We meet in person and we have developed deep friendships.

Here's a thought experiment:

What if we (the Ubuntu leadership community at large) were to enable and actively encourage Ubuntu teams (groups really) at any geographical level? What if we called them "teams" rather than "sub" teams. What if we "allowed" them to operate autonomously. What if we banished the term "allowed" from our dictionary?

I advocate the removal of geographical team limitations outright. We can and should have teams at the block, neighbourhood, village, town, city, province/state, region, country, super-country (continent), or even planetary level. We already have teams that operate super-country, and others that want to but are actively discouraged from doing so. (Yes, actively.) I can also envision teams smaller than city teams that could flourish if encouraged.

We (briefly) discussed moving toward the "at any geographical level" team structure today at UDS during the Community Roundtable session. I tabled the idea of moving to this model on a *trial* basis to see what (if any) chaos ensues. For an initial trial period, we could try it, say for a single UDS cycle and then measure the result.

My guess is that we (the collective we) are being too fearful of an outcome that would likely never manifest itself. The best way to overcome that fear is with a controlled experiment that results in data. Generally speaking, I propose that we eliminate any artificial barriers to team creation that are not based on data. Any person in a place that has no existing team would be able to form one, or to join another team. Any person not satisfied with a team in their geography would be free, empowered, and encouraged to set up another team, even if the geography overlaps with the existing team. One team in one geography might not be the best thing for Ubuntu, especially if/when that team is out of alignment with Ubuntu.

Ubuntu has no country or boundaries. Why impose them? Are we not all stateless after all? Are we Ubuntu?

I say, "Let a thousand flowers bloom!"

Ubuntu Global Jam - An Early Call for Events!

The Ubuntu Global Jam ("Saucy Salamander" cycle edition) is coming! This event is when the entire Ubuntu community comes together to make a real difference to Ubuntu and to have a great time in the process. Everyone is able to contribute to the Jam, and everyone is welcome and encouraged to get involved.

I would like to encourage you to

Register an event early!

Sure, we're still months away, but the sooner we get planning, the bigger and better this Jam will be.

The Ubuntu Global Jam is scheduled to occur on these dates:

  • Friday September 13, 2013
  • Saturday September 14, 2013
  • Sunday September 15, 2013

This part is important! Please add your event to the Ubuntu Team Portal so others can find your event and so the world can start seeing all the amazing things that you're doing for Ubuntu.

Good documentation about how to create a successful Global Jam event is here:

A short video explaining the most basic steps is here:

Thanks in advance for participating in this upcoming cycle's Global Jam event. If you have any questions, please feel free to

Get in touch!

Update! Did you know there's a Saucy Salamander Cafe in Maryland? Now you do. Maybe Ubuntu people from all over the world should gather there and Jam. Share your thoughts in the comments.


Thanks jliau for the spiffy new Jam logo. Good jam on that globe!

Tip Jar

Liked one of my articles? Please consider clicking the "Donate" button above

Namecoin (NMC) is also appreciated:

Thanks! Your support helps keep this site free and interesting.

An Ubuntu show right from Vancouver!

Real Local Community