Yes, that's right. The Ubuntu Developer Summit (Quantal Quetzal edition) kicks off today in Oakland California.
Our mascot Quincy (the famous Quetzal) invites you to join the fun remotely.
Review some blueprints. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-q
Attend some developer sessions via IRC. http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-q/
Chirp in and make Ubuntu better!
Are you attending UDS-Q in person? Be sure to take lots of photos and post them to your favourite photo sharing service. Tags: ubuntu, uds-q, quantal
Quincy's in a happy quantal state today!
The journalists that have previously been getting the release names of Ubuntu wrong are starting to learn and improve. Fewer hits of erroneous animals today, which is amazing given the fact that the unbelievably amazing Ubuntu 12.04 was just released yesterday and that was a golden opportunity to spread misinformation by calling it an animal name.
Perhaps Quincy is having an impact? I think so. Do you?
The metamorphosis from animal to number is complete! Check out what our Pangolin has become here: http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/whats-new
Or better yet, find (or create) your local Ubuntu enthusiast community and explore Ubuntu together, in person. "Ubuntu is not just software."
Want to play along? GIMP is your friend.
@ Ben: We're in Vancouver BC.
Mark's Quantal Quetzal announcement. is all over the web, sort of.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about.
Did you spot the error in the original article? Probably not. TL;DR?
The author states: "Mark Shuttleworth has just announced the codename for the upcoming Ubuntu release: Ubuntu 12.10 will be called Quantal Quetzal."
The statement should read: "Mark Shuttleworth has just announced the codename for the upcoming Ubuntu release: Quantal Quetzal will become Ubuntu 12.10."
It's a subtle but important distinction. Pre-release versions of Ubuntu are given animal names. Released versions of Ubuntu are given numbers.
Please read that statement twice before writing your next "linux" article. Oh, and dropping the "L" word sure would be an added bonus. This is not the 90's. ;)
Did you find an article with the same error? Please report the URL in the comments.
The first ever "Best of Jam" photo contest has concluded.
With a decisive 36% of the vote, our winner is:
Our lucky winner will receive a very slick Vancouver t-shirt directly from downtown Vancouver compliments of me and as a little souvenir of Ubuntu Vancouver.
Thanks for playing! See you at the next Jam. Bring jam, and watch magical things happen...
It's voting day!
Review the contestants. (open the link)
Place your vote! (open the link)
Before the Ubuntu Global Jam began, I announced the first ever "Best of Jam" photo contest. Quoting my original post:
Here's the fun part. If your photo is selected as the "Best of Jam" you'll receive very slick Vancouver t-shirt directly from downtown Vancouver compliments of me and as a little souvenir of Ubuntu Vancouver. Ways to win... Take fun photos. Smile. Pose creatively. Include Jam.
I'll announce the winner shortly. Thanks for playing!
In case you haven't seen my "Ubuntu Community Lexicon" series, the earlier post and an explanation of the rationale is here. This post is a follow-up and a refinement.
Where is your place in Ubuntu Community?
Are you part of the Ubuntu Online Community? Or do you prefer to belong to the Ubuntu In-Real-Life Community? Admittedly, the Ubuntu Online Community is a bit of a blind spot for me. I interact much less often in Ubuntu IRC channels, Ubuntu Forums, Ask Ubuntu, etc. than I do in real life. Instead, I prefer meet Ubuntu friends and co-conspirators in person.
Having said that, a lot of what I see and read that says "Ubuntu Community" is really about the Ubuntu Online Community. I believe this is an artifact from the time when Ubuntu (the project) was small and dispersed and there was little opportunity for in-real-life meetings. Though these days (of being small) are gone, we're still managing a lot of the community as if it exists primarily online and we're optimizing for that. (Maybe even subconsciously.)
With that in mind, it is useful to integrate the notion of "online" into the Ubuntu Community Lexicon which I started developing and socializing at UDS-P. Perhaps this will help us deploy community management techniques that are more precise. And, by extension, maybe we'll gain some benefit that we can map to our "in-real-life" community development.
Enter research. By day, I'm an IT management professional. I also enjoy researching social aspects of computing (something I do as a hobby, believe it or not). While reading the International Journal of Managing Information Technology recently, I came across online community terminology that is helpful, which I will paraphrase from the original authors (see footnote) and adapt to our use case:
Outsider: A person who is unaware of Ubuntu forums, IRC channels, discussion boards, etc. and likely not interested in Ubuntu's online community.
Non-interested Knower: A person who knows about Ubuntu's online community but never browses its posts. S/he's currently not interested in the content but might be interested in the future.
Trouble Maker: A person who post "malwords" (unwanted input, derogatory posts, trollish content) that can hurt Ubuntu's online community by making other participants feel bad. Even if these individuals provide information they are undesirable because other people may leave if they are subjected to their vitriol.
Lurker: A person who just consumes without providing any new information. Their overall value to the community is roughly zero.
Non-contributing Participant: A person who does not provide any new/useful information, but consumes information or participates in other activities. They ask questions, give
feedback, and thank others. (You can think of these people almost as fans at a hockey game.)
Partially-contributing Participant: A person who contributes sometimes, but is mostly a consumer.
Contributor: Individuals who provide new information regularly as their main act.
Which group most closely resembles the people you know in Ubuntu's Online Community?
And, less obviously:
For whom do we want to optimize our online community? What steps, if any, are we prepared to take to innoculate it from those we don't want.
Food for thought. If you'd like to offer some ideas, the comments are open.
Remember: When we speak about community, lets use adjectives. Let's use more than one adjective if one isn't enough. Let's use precise language to help frame the problems we are trying to solve in the Precise cycle, and beyond.
The original paper is here:
"A Continuum of Participants in Online Communities" by Xuequn Wang and Yanjun Yu.